Easy2Siksha.com
GNDU Question Paper-2024
Bachelor of Business Administration
BBA 5
th
Semester
COST ACCOUNTING
Time Allowed: Three Hours Max. Marks: 50
Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The
Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.
SECTION-A
1. What do you mean by Cost Accounting? What are the Objectives and limitations of Cost
Accounting ?
2. What are the limitations of Financial Accounting ? How does Cost Accounting overcome
these limitations?
SECTIONE-B
3 What are the different criteria for classification of cost? What is the purpose of
classification of cost according to different criteria ?
4. The following information relates to contract 100 as at 31 December, 1998:
Rs.
Wages
42,000
Materials direct to site
54,000
Material transferred to River-view site
1,500
Plant purchased at cost
12,500
Plant Transferred from River- view site
5,300
Easy2Siksha.com
Sub- contractors charges
19,500
Site expenses (power etc .)
5,000
Materials on site (31-12-98)
18,300
Plant on site (13-12-98)
14,750
Pre- Payments at (31-12-98)
500
Accurate wages at 31-12-98
920
Cost of work done but not certified at 31-12-98
7,250
Head office charges are 10% of the wages Material from stores
-
Material from stores
650
The Contract Value is Rs. 5,50,000. From the above information prepare the Contract
Account for the year ended 31 December, 1998 clearly showing the profit for the year.
Value of work certified by the Architect was Rs. 1,37,500 and the contractor had made
progress payments of this amount less 15% agreed retention percentage.
SECTION-C
5. The particulars of two plants producing an identical product with same selling price are
as under:
Capacity Utilization
Plant – A 70% (Rs. Lacs)
Plant – A 60% (Rs.
Lacs)
Sales
150
90
Variables
105
75
Fixed cost
30
20
It has been decided to merge Plant B with Plant A. The additional Fixed Expenses involved
in the merger amount to 2 lacs. You are required to find out:
(a) The Breakeven Point of Plant A and Plant B before merger and the breakeven point of
the merged plant.
(b) The capacity utilization of the integrated plant required to earn a profit of Rs. 18 lacs.
6. What are the different types of Standard Cost? What are the advantages and limitations
of Standard Costing?
Easy2Siksha.com
SECTION-D
7. The following data pertains to a company's first week of operations in June, 2011:
Material:
Actual purchased = 1,500 units @ Rs. 3.80 per unit
Actual usage =1,350 units
Standard usage = 1,020 units @ Rs. 4.00 per unit
Direct Labour:
Actual hours =310 hours @ Rs. 12.10 per hour
Standard hours = 340 hours @ Rs. 12.00 per hour
Required: Compare the following variances to determine whether they are favourable or
unfavourable:
(a) Material purchase price variance and quantity variance.
(b) Labour rate efficiency variance.
8.Distinguish between budget, budgeting and budgetary control. What are the advantages
and limitations of budgetary control?
Easy2Siksha.com
GNDU Answer Paper-2024
Bachelor of Business Administration
BBA 5
th
Semester
COST ACCOUNTING
Time Allowed: Three Hours Max. Marks: 50
Note: Attempt Five questions in all, selecting at least One question from each section. The
Fifth question may be attempted from any section. All questions carry equal marks.
SECTION-A
1. What do you mean by Cost Accounting? What are the Objectives and limitations of Cost
Accounting ?
Ans: Cost Accounting: A Story That Makes Sense
Imagine for a moment that you are the captain of a ship. Your ship is not sailing on oceans,
but on the stormy seas of the business world. Your job as the captain is not only to steer the
ship safely but also to ensure that the fuel is used wisely, the sailors are paid properly, and
every resource on the ship is managed carefully.
Now, if you had no record of how much food is left, how much fuel is burning, or how many
coins are being spent, what would happen? You’d soon run out of resources and sink before
reaching your destination.
This is where Cost Accounting comes in. It acts like the captain’s logbook — keeping track of
every little expense, showing where money goes, and helping in planning the future
journey.
What is Cost Accounting?
In simple words, Cost Accounting is a system of recording, analyzing, and controlling the
costs of production of goods or services. It helps a business know “Where is the money
being spent? How much is it costing us to produce one product or service? Can we reduce
unnecessary spending?”
Easy2Siksha.com
While Financial Accounting tells us how much profit or loss the business made overall, Cost
Accounting dives deep inside the process. It answers questions like:
• How much did it cost to make one chair?
• Which department is spending too much?
• Can we produce the same goods at a lower cost without losing quality?
So, if Financial Accounting is like a report card showing overall performance, Cost
Accounting is like a daily diary helping you improve step by step.
Objectives of Cost Accounting
Now, let’s imagine you are running a bakery. You sell bread, cakes, and cookies. Why do you
need Cost Accounting? Let’s explore its objectives, one by one, in story-like fashion:
1. Determining the Cost of Products
Just like a baker needs to know the cost of flour, sugar, and butter in one cake,
businesses need to calculate the exact cost of each product. Cost Accounting ensures
that no hidden expenses are ignored, so you know the true cost per unit.
2. Controlling Costs
Suppose your bakery is wasting too much electricity by running ovens even when
they are empty. Cost Accounting highlights such wastage and helps you control
unnecessary expenses. It acts like a mirror showing where money is leaking.
3. Setting Prices
Imagine selling a cake for ₹200 without realizing it actually costs ₹220 to make it.
That would be a disaster! Cost Accounting helps you fix prices correctly so that you
don’t make losses.
4. Assisting in Decision-Making
Should you start selling pastries or focus only on bread? Should you invest in a new
oven? Cost Accounting gives detailed information that helps in making such
decisions wisely.
5. Profit Planning and Forecasting
With proper records, you can predict the future. For example, if butter prices rise,
you can forecast the impact on your cake cost and decide whether to increase prices
or find cheaper suppliers.
6. Measuring Efficiency
Cost Accounting compares the actual performance with standards. For example, if it
usually takes 2 hours to bake 50 cakes but today it took 3 hours, something is wrong.
This way, efficiency is monitored.
7. Helping Management in Control
For the bakery, this means keeping track of each department—purchasing
ingredients, baking, packaging, and selling. Cost Accounting acts as a guiding light for
management at every step.
8. Providing Data for Financial Accounts
Cost Accounting does not replace Financial Accounting but supports it by giving
Easy2Siksha.com
accurate cost data, which ultimately helps in preparing profit and loss accounts and
balance sheets more effectively.
So, the main purpose of Cost Accounting is like being a detective inside the business—
finding out where money is going, where it is wasted, and how profits can be increased.
Limitations of Cost Accounting
But wait — is Cost Accounting perfect? Just like every hero has weaknesses, Cost Accounting
also has some limitations. Let’s look at them with simple examples:
1. Costly to Implement
For a small bakery, installing a full-fledged cost accounting system might feel like
buying a giant machine for a tiny kitchen. Maintaining records, hiring experts, and
buying software can be expensive.
2. Complex System
Sometimes Cost Accounting feels like solving a puzzle. There are too many methods,
procedures, and rules. If not simplified, employees may find it confusing and
burdensome.
3. Not a Substitute for Financial Accounting
Cost Accounting tells you the cost of making bread but not whether the bakery
overall is in profit or loss. You still need financial accounts.
4. Based on Estimates
Not everything can be measured exactly. For example, estimating the life of an oven
or the depreciation of equipment involves assumptions. These estimates may differ
from reality.
5. Resistance from Staff
Employees might see cost accounting as “extra work.” Bakers may not like noting
down every spoon of sugar used, and workers might resist changes in procedures.
6. No Universal Approach
What works for one bakery may not work for another. Methods of costing vary from
industry to industry, so there is no single formula that fits all.
7. Limited to Cost Data
Cost Accounting shows you cost-related data, but it doesn’t always consider external
factors like government policies, market trends, or economic changes that can also
affect business decisions.
Bringing it All Together
Let’s go back to the ship story. A ship captain without records will sail blindly and crash. A
baker without cost records will sell cakes without knowing if he’s making a profit or loss.
Similarly, a company without Cost Accounting may earn revenue but still struggle because of
uncontrolled expenses.
Easy2Siksha.com
• Cost Accounting is not just about numbers; it is about clarity.
• It tells a business what each product really costs.
• It helps in controlling wastage, fixing correct prices, and planning for the future.
• But at the same time, it requires money, trained people, and discipline to
implement.
So, while Cost Accounting is like a compass that guides a business towards profit, it is not a
magic wand. It must be used wisely, carefully, and in harmony with other accounting
systems.
Conclusion
In essence, Cost Accounting is the science and art of tracking costs. Its objectives are to
measure, control, and guide costs so that businesses can increase profits and reduce
wastage. Its limitations are that it can be expensive, complex, and based on assumptions.
But just like a student needs both books and a teacher, a business needs both Financial
Accounting and Cost Accounting. One shows the overall result, and the other shows the
hidden details behind that result.
And that’s why Cost Accounting is not just a subject in textbooks—it is a real-life tool that
keeps businesses afloat, just like a compass keeps a ship on the right course.
2. What are the limitations of Financial Accounting ? How does Cost Accounting overcome
these limitations?
Ans: Imagine for a moment that you are the owner of a small bakery called “Sweet
Cravings.” Every day you bake cakes, pastries, and cookies, and happily sell them to your
customers. At the end of each month, you sit down to check your Financial Accounts—the
usual Profit & Loss statement and Balance Sheet. It tells you:
• How much you earned in total.
• How much you spent overall.
• And finally, whether you made a profit or suffered a loss.
At first glance, this feels perfect—after all, isn’t that what every businessman wants to
know?
But here’s the twist: one fine day, you start to wonder—
• Which product is actually giving me the most profit?
• Are pastries eating up too much cost compared to cookies?
• Is my chocolate cake priced correctly, or am I selling it at a loss without realizing?
Easy2Siksha.com
Sadly, Financial Accounting cannot answer these questions. It only gives you the big picture
but hides the fine details. And that’s where Cost Accounting enters the stage like a detective
with a magnifying glass—helping you track, analyze, and control costs with precision.
Now, let’s dive deeper into this “story of two systems”—first understanding the limitations
of Financial Accounting, and then how Cost Accounting overcomes them.
Limitations of Financial Accounting
1. Focuses only on overall results, not detailed analysis
Financial accounting tells you the net profit or loss at the end of the year. But it
doesn’t show where that profit came from or which product caused losses. For
example, in the bakery, it will tell you the bakery earned ₹1,00,000 profit, but not
whether pastries are profitable or if cakes are secretly draining money.
2. Historical in nature, not futuristic
Financial accounts are like a photo album—they record only the past. They do not
predict or help in planning for the future. By the time you know about a loss, it’s
already too late. Imagine realizing after a year that your chocolate cake was
underpriced—you cannot go back and change it.
3. No system of cost control
Financial accounting simply records expenses. It doesn’t ask: “Was this expense
necessary?” or “Could it have been reduced?” So wastages, inefficiencies, or
unnecessary overheads remain hidden.
4. Does not provide product-wise or department-wise profit
Suppose your bakery has three departments—cakes, cookies, and pastries. Financial
accounting won’t tell you which department contributes more. You only see the
total. This makes decision-making difficult.
5. Ignores abnormal losses
Let’s say a batch of cookies got burnt in the oven—Financial Accounting will just
record it as an expense. But it won’t highlight it as an avoidable loss. Managers won’t
get the signal to take corrective action.
6. Stock valuation problem
Financial accounts often value stock at cost or market price, whichever is lower. But
it doesn’t give detailed information like cost per unit or cost per process. So
management doesn’t know the exact cost structure.
7. Lacks aid in decision-making
Should you increase the price of pastries? Should you discontinue a product? Should
you make or buy raw materials? Financial Accounting gives no guidance. It is silent
on managerial decisions.
8. No emphasis on efficiency
Financial accounts don’t reveal whether resources (labour, machines, materials) are
being used efficiently. They only show expenses after they have happened.
In short, Financial Accounting is like a scoreboard in cricket—it tells you the final score, but
not how each player performed or which strategy worked.
Easy2Siksha.com
How Cost Accounting Overcomes These Limitations
Now, enter Cost Accounting, the hero of our story. Instead of just showing totals, it breaks
down every detail, helps control costs, and supports managerial decisions. Let’s see how it
solves the above problems one by one:
1. Provides detailed analysis (Product-wise/Department-wise results)
Unlike Financial Accounting, Cost Accounting calculates the cost per unit, per
product, per process, and even per department. For the bakery, it will reveal:
o Profit margin on cakes = 20%
o Profit margin on cookies = 30%
o Pastries = actually making a loss!
This detail helps in focusing on profitable items.
2. Helps in planning and future decision-making
Cost accounting uses techniques like standard costing, marginal costing, and
budgetary control to estimate future costs and profits. It’s like forecasting the
weather—you can prepare an umbrella if rain is expected. Similarly, the bakery
owner can decide in advance whether to increase prices or reduce costs.
3. Effective cost control
Cost accounting compares standard cost (what the cost should be) with actual cost
(what it is). If labour cost is higher than standard, management can immediately take
steps to reduce overtime or improve efficiency.
4. Highlights avoidable losses and wastages
Abnormal losses like burnt cookies, electricity wastage, or idle machine hours are
separately recorded and highlighted. This pushes management to take corrective
measures and avoid recurrence.
5. Aids in fixing selling price
With a clear idea of cost per unit, managers can fix the selling price scientifically,
ensuring neither loss nor overpricing. For example, if the cost of producing one
pastry is ₹20, the bakery can set a selling price of ₹25 with confidence.
6. Improves efficiency
Cost Accounting uses tools like variance analysis, time and motion studies, and
efficiency ratios to check whether labour and materials are used effectively. It
encourages better utilization of resources.
7. Helps in decision-making
Cost Accounting answers practical business questions such as:
o Should we make or buy ingredients?
o Should we discontinue pastries?
o Should we reduce prices during off-season to attract more customers?
This makes it a strong tool for managerial decisions.
8. Better stock valuation
Cost Accounting provides detailed stock records showing not only the quantity but
also the cost per batch, per job, or per process. This helps in controlling material
wastage and accurate reporting.
Easy2Siksha.com
In short, Cost Accounting is like the coach in cricket—not only does he look at the final
score but also checks which batsman is weak, which bowler is costly, and what changes are
needed for the next match.
Conclusion
So, to wrap up the story:
• Financial Accounting is like a mirror that shows you your overall face but hides the
details of each feature.
• Cost Accounting is like a magnifying glass that zooms into every detail, highlighting
strengths, weaknesses, and areas of improvement.
Both are important—Financial Accounting is necessary for external reporting (shareholders,
tax authorities, regulators), while Cost Accounting is vital for internal use by management.
Therefore, a smart business never relies on Financial Accounting alone—it always combines
it with Cost Accounting to make informed decisions, control costs, and ensure long-term
profitability.
SECTIONE-B
3 What are the different criteria for classification of cost? What is the purpose of
classification of cost according to different criteria ?
Ans: 󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 The Story of How We Classify Costs
Imagine you are the manager of a bakery. Every morning, you wake up, open your shop, and
start baking bread, cakes, and cookies. Now, while you are baking, you notice one thing: you
are spending money on so many things – flour, sugar, butter, electricity for the oven, wages
for your helpers, rent for the shop, packaging, delivery van fuel, etc.
At the end of the day, you realize: “If I don’t properly understand how my costs are divided,
I will never know how much profit I am really making.”
This is exactly where classification of cost comes into play. Just like we classify clothes in our
cupboard into shirts, pants, and shoes, or we classify books into subjects, in the same way,
accountants and managers classify costs into different categories.
The main purpose is very simple: to understand, control, and make better decisions about
money.
Easy2Siksha.com
But costs are not just one straight line. They are like a rainbow – you can view them in
different colors depending on the angle. Similarly, costs can be classified from different
points of view, and each classification serves a different purpose.
So, let us walk through the different criteria for cost classification, one by one, with simple
examples from our bakery.
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 1. Classification According to Elements
This is the basic way of breaking down costs. Just like a cake is made of flour, sugar, and
butter, costs are also made of three big ingredients:
1. Material Cost – These are the raw materials you use. For the bakery, it’s flour, sugar,
chocolate, butter, etc.
2. Labour Cost – This is the money you pay to people who work for you. For example,
the baker who helps knead the dough, or the cashier at the counter.
3. Expenses (Overheads) – These are all other costs that are not material or labor. For
example, electricity, rent, packaging, delivery costs, etc.
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: This classification helps us know what our money is mainly spent on. If material
costs are too high, maybe we need a cheaper supplier. If labor costs are rising, maybe we
need more efficient workers.
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 2. Classification According to Function
Now think about your bakery again. You don’t just spend money on baking. You also spend
on selling, delivering, and keeping the shop running. That’s why costs are also classified
according to functions of a business:
1. Production Cost – The cost of actually making the bread or cake (flour, baker’s
wages, electricity for ovens).
2. Administration Cost – The cost of running the bakery office (manager’s salary,
stationery, accounting software).
3. Selling and Distribution Cost – The cost of promoting and delivering your cakes to
customers (advertisements, packaging, delivery van fuel).
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: This helps in finding out which part of the business is eating most money.
Maybe production is efficient but selling is too costly. Then we know where to control
expenses.
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 3. Classification According to Nature/Traceability
Easy2Siksha.com
This is like asking: Can I directly see this cost in the product or not?
1. Direct Cost – Costs that can be directly linked to a product. For example, flour for
bread, or wages of the baker making the cake.
2. Indirect Cost – Costs that cannot be directly traced to one product. For example,
electricity of the whole shop, rent of the building, or salary of the manager.
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: This helps in calculating the exact cost of one product. If you want to know
how much one loaf of bread costs, you add up direct costs, and then allocate indirect costs
fairly.
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 4. Classification According to Behavior
Now imagine this: Some costs change when you make more bread, and some costs don’t
change at all. This is cost behavior.
1. Fixed Cost – Costs that remain the same no matter how much you produce. For
example, shop rent is fixed whether you bake 10 cakes or 100.
2. Variable Cost – Costs that change with production. If you bake more cakes, you use
more flour, sugar, and butter.
3. Semi-variable Cost – Costs that are partly fixed and partly variable. For example,
electricity: you pay a fixed minimum bill, and extra if you use more power.
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: This classification is very useful in decision-making. For example, if demand
falls, you still need to pay fixed rent, so you must calculate how much you must sell to cover
fixed costs (break-even point).
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 5. Classification According to Controllability
This is about asking: Can the manager control this cost or not?
1. Controllable Cost – Costs that can be influenced by a manager. For example, the
bakery manager can decide how much flour to buy or how many helpers to hire.
2. Uncontrollable Cost – Costs that cannot be influenced at that level. For example,
government taxes, or depreciation charged on machines.
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: This helps in performance evaluation. We should not blame a manager for
costs they cannot control.
Easy2Siksha.com
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 6. Classification According to Time
Costs can also be looked at based on time.
1. Historical Cost – Costs already incurred in the past (last month’s electricity bill).
2. Predetermined Cost – Estimated costs for the future (budget for next month’s flour
and sugar).
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: This helps in planning and control. If your budget (predetermined cost) and
actual cost differ a lot, you know where the problem lies.
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 7. Classification for Decision-Making
Finally, some costs are specifically looked at when managers have to take decisions. For
example:
1. Relevant Cost – Costs that matter for a decision. If you are deciding whether to
accept a special order, only additional flour, sugar, and labor are relevant.
2. Irrelevant Cost – Costs that do not affect the decision. Past rent already paid is
irrelevant for future decisions.
3. Opportunity Cost – The benefit you lose when you choose one option over another.
For example, if you use your bakery space for cakes, you lose the chance of renting it
out.
4. Sunk Cost – Costs that are already spent and cannot be recovered. For example,
money spent on a machine last year.
5. Differential Cost – The difference in cost between two alternatives (like the cost
difference between baking 100 cakes or 200 cakes).
󷷑󷷒󷷓󷷔 Purpose: These classifications help in choosing the best option for the business.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Why Do We Classify Costs at All? (Purpose Summarized)
Now you may ask, “Why so many classifications? Isn’t it confusing?”
Think of it like this: If you only look at money spent in total, it’s like looking at a big messy
bag of clothes. But when you classify, you fold shirts separately, pants separately, and socks
separately. Suddenly, everything looks neat and you can make better choices.
So, the purposes are:
• To know where money is going (elements).
• To see which part of the business costs more (functions).
• To find product cost accurately (direct vs indirect).
Easy2Siksha.com
• To plan production and sales (fixed vs variable).
• To evaluate managers fairly (controllable vs uncontrollable).
• To compare past and future (historical vs predetermined).
• To make smart decisions (relevant, opportunity, sunk).
󷔬󷔭󷔮󷔯󷔰󷔱󷔴󷔵󷔶󷔷󷔲󷔳󷔸 Conclusion
So, classifying costs is not just an accounting exercise. It’s a powerful tool for survival and
growth in business. For our bakery, or for any company, knowing costs in different ways is
like having a map – it tells you where you are spending, where you can save, and where you
can grow.
In short, cost classification helps managers plan better, control better, and decide better.
4. The following information relates to contract 100 as at 31 December, 1998:
Rs.
Wages
42,000
Materials direct to site
54,000
Material transferred to River-view site
1,500
Plant purchased at cost
12,500
Plant Transferred from River- view site
5,300
Sub- contractors charges
19,500
Site expenses (power etc .)
5,000
Materials on site (31-12-98)
18,300
Plant on site (13-12-98)
14,750
Pre- Payments at (31-12-98)
500
Accurate wages at 31-12-98
920
Cost of work done but not certified at 31-12-98
7,250
Head office charges are 10% of the wages Material from stores
-
Material from stores
650
The Contract Value is Rs. 5,50,000. From the above information prepare the Contract
Account for the year ended 31 December, 1998 clearly showing the profit for the year.
Value of work certified by the Architect was Rs. 1,37,500 and the contractor had made
progress payments of this amount less 15% agreed retention percentage.
Easy2Siksha.com
Ans: 󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 The Story Begins
Imagine there is a construction company that has just taken up a new project — Contract
100. The contract is big, worth Rs. 5,50,000, and the contractor is excited to complete it.
Like every project, money goes in and out — wages, materials, machines, and site expenses.
At the end of the year (31 December 1998), the contractor needs to prepare a Contract
Account to see how much profit was earned up to that date.
Preparing this account is a bit like keeping a diary of everything that happened on site —
how much was spent, what was left over, and how much value of work has been certified
(approved by the architect).
Our task is to put all these details into a proper Contract Account. But before we do that,
let’s walk through each item one by one, like pieces of a puzzle.
󼩺󼩻 Breaking Down the Items
1. Wages (Rs. 42,000)
These are the payments made to the workers. In a contract account, all wages are
treated as direct expenses because they go straight into constructing the site.
2. Materials direct to site (Rs. 54,000)
These are the materials purchased and sent directly to the construction site. Again,
this is a direct cost.
3. Materials transferred to River-view site (Rs. 1,500)
Think of it like this: some of the material meant for this project was borrowed by
another project (River-view site). Since it’s no longer available here, we subtract it
from our contract account.
4. Plant purchased (Rs. 12,500)
Plant here means machinery and equipment used on site (not trees 󷊆󷊇). This is an
asset, but when we purchase it for the contract, we debit it initially. Later, we check
its value remaining on site.
5. Plant transferred from River-view site (Rs. 5,300)
Some plant was brought in from another site to help us here. So, we add this amount
because it is now part of this contract’s resources.
6. Sub-contractors’ charges (Rs. 19,500)
Sometimes, the main contractor hires small subcontractors for specific work. Their
charges are also added as costs.
7. Site expenses (power etc.) Rs. 5,000
These are small day-to-day expenses like electricity, water, etc. Directly added to
contract cost.
8. Materials on site (31-12-98) Rs. 18,300
At year-end, not all materials are used. Whatever is left is treated as an asset and
deducted from total material cost.
Easy2Siksha.com
9. Plant on site (31-12-98) Rs. 14,750
At the end, some plant is still available on site. This is deducted too because it still
has value and is not fully consumed.
10. Pre-payments (Rs. 500)
Any amount paid in advance is considered as asset, so it will be deducted.
11. Accrued wages (Rs. 920)
These are wages due but not yet paid. They are added to wages because they belong
to this year.
12. Cost of work not certified (Rs. 7,250)
Sometimes, the contractor completes some work, but the architect has not yet
certified it. Still, this is valuable work and is recorded as an asset.
13. Head office charges (10% of wages)
The head office also incurs costs (like admin charges). These are added at 10% of
total wages.
14. Material from stores (Rs. 650)
Some materials are issued from the company’s central store. This is an additional
cost.
15. Work certified by architect Rs. 1,37,500
This is the approved value of work till date. It is a major figure because profit is
based on this.
16. Progress payment
The contractor doesn’t get the full Rs. 1,37,500 right away. The client deducts 15%
retention for safety.
So, cash received = 85% of Rs. 1,37,500 = Rs. 1,16,875.
󷩆󷩇󷩈󷩉󷩌󷩊󷩋 Preparing the Contract Account
Now let’s construct the Contract Account step by step.
Contract No. 100 Account for year ended 31 Dec 1998
Dr. Side (Costs incurred)
• Wages paid: Rs. 42,000
• Add: Accrued wages: Rs. 920 → 42,920
• Direct materials: Rs. 54,000
• Add: From stores: Rs. 650
• Less: Transferred to River-view: (1,500) → 53,150
• Plant purchased: Rs. 12,500
• Plant transferred in: Rs. 5,300 → 17,800
• Subcontractors’ charges: Rs. 19,500
• Site expenses: Rs. 5,000
• Head office charges: 10% of wages (42,920) = Rs. 4,292
Total Costs (Debit): Rs. 1,42,662
Easy2Siksha.com
Cr. Side (Value & assets at site)
• Materials on site: Rs. 18,300
• Plant on site: Rs. 14,750
• Pre-payments: Rs. 500
• Work not certified: Rs. 7,250
• Work certified: Rs. 1,37,500
Total (Credit): Rs. 1,78,300
󽀼󽀽󽁀󽁁󽀾󽁂󽀿󽁃 Balance & Profit
Now let’s compare:
• Credit side = Rs. 1,78,300
• Debit side = Rs. 1,42,662
So, Notional Profit = 35,638
But wait! In contract accounting, we don’t transfer the full notional profit. We calculate how
much can be taken to P&L, depending on work certified.
Here,
• Work certified = Rs. 1,37,500
• Contract price = Rs. 5,50,000
So, about 25% of contract is completed. (137,500 ÷ 550,000 = 25%).
Rule: When work certified is less than 25%, no profit is transferred.
But since it is exactly 25%, we transfer 1/3rd of Notional Profit × Cash received/Work
certified.
= 1/3 × 35,638 × (1,16,875 ÷ 1,37,500)
= 11,879 × 0.85
≈ Rs. 10,097 (Profit transferred to P&L)
󽆪󽆫󽆬 Final Picture
• Notional Profit: Rs. 35,638
• Profit taken to P&L: Rs. 10,097
• Balance kept as reserve in Contract Account: Rs. 25,541
Easy2Siksha.com
󷘧󷘨 Wrapping it Up Like a Story
So, in simple words, this contract is like a diary entry of a hardworking contractor. The
workers got their wages, the machines (plant) worked on the site, some materials were
used, some left, and even a few were borrowed by another site. Subcontractors came in,
electricity bills were paid, and the office overheads were added.
By the year-end, the architect had certified work worth Rs. 1,37,500, but the client paid only
85% (Rs. 1,16,875) — keeping 15% as security. The contractor, after carefully recording
every penny spent and every asset left on site, found that the notional profit was Rs.
35,638.
However, accounting prudence doesn’t allow us to take away all that profit immediately.
Since only one-fourth of the work is done, the contractor sensibly transfers just about Rs.
10,097 to the profit and loss account and keeps the rest as reserve for the future.
SECTION-C
5. The particulars of two plants producing an identical product with same selling price are
as under:
Capacity Utilization
Plant – A 70% (Rs. Lacs)
Plant – A 60% (Rs.
Lacs)
Sales
150
90
Variables
105
75
Fixed cost
30
20
It has been decided to merge Plant B with Plant A. The additional Fixed Expenses involved
in the merger amount to 2 lacs. You are required to find out:
(a) The Breakeven Point of Plant A and Plant B before merger and the breakeven point of
the merged plant.
(b) The capacity utilization of the integrated plant required to earn a profit of Rs. 18 lacs.
Ans: A friendly factory story — understanding breakeven and required capacity like a tale
Imagine two small factories on the same street, both making the exact same chocolate bar.
One is Plant A (the energetic older sibling) and the other is Plant B (the quieter, smaller
shop). Both sell the chocolate bars at the same selling price. One day the owners decide to
merge the two operations into a single, bigger plant. Before they do that, they want to
answer two questions:
Easy2Siksha.com
1. What are the breakeven points of Plant A and Plant B individually, and what will be
the breakeven point after merging?
2. After merging, what percentage of total capacity must the single big plant use so the
merged business earns a profit of Rs. 18 lacs?
I'll tell this like a story — step by step — and show you the arithmetic carefully so it all feels
obvious.
The facts about our factories (numbers given)
From the problem:
• Plant A (running at 70% capacity)
o Sales = Rs. 150 lacs
o Variable cost = Rs. 105 lacs
o Fixed cost = Rs. 30 lacs
• Plant B (running at 60% capacity)
o Sales = Rs. 90 lacs
o Variable cost = Rs. 75 lacs
o Fixed cost = Rs. 20 lacs
When combined, the merger will add Rs. 2 lacs extra fixed expenses (maybe integration
costs), so the merged plant’s fixed cost = 30 + 20 + 2 = Rs. 52 lacs.
Step 1 — Find each plant’s contribution and contribution ratio
Contribution = Sales − Variable cost. This tells us how much money from sales is available to
cover fixed costs and then profit.
Plant A
• Contribution = 150 − 105 = 45 lacs.
• Contribution ratio (CM ratio) = Contribution ÷ Sales = 45 ÷ 150.
o 45 ÷ 150 = 0.30 = 30%.
Plant B
• Contribution = 90 − 75 = 15 lacs.
• Contribution ratio = 15 ÷ 90.
o 15 ÷ 90 = 0.166666... = 16.6667% (or 1/6).
Merged (at current sales of both combined)
• Combined Sales (current) = 150 + 90 = 240 lacs.
Easy2Siksha.com
• Combined Contribution = 45 + 15 = 60 lacs.
• Combined CM ratio = 60 ÷ 240 = 0.25 = 25%.
(So merged, every rupee of sales contributes 25 paise toward fixed costs and profit.)
Step 2 — Find full capacity sales for each plant (so we can also express breakeven as
capacity %)
We’re told current capacity utilizations, so we can back out full-capacity sales.
Plant A full capacity sales
• Current sales = 150 at 70% capacity.
• Full capacity = 150 ÷ 0.70 = 214.285714... ≈ 214.2857 lacs.
Plant B full capacity sales
• Current sales = 90 at 60% capacity.
• Full capacity = 90 ÷ 0.60 = 150 lacs exactly.
Merged full capacity = 214.2857 + 150 = 364.2857 lacs (this is the total sales possible if both
plants ran at 100% and then became one integrated capacity).
(a) Breakeven points — in Rs. lacs and as capacity %
Breakeven sales = Fixed cost ÷ Contribution ratio.
Plant A (before merger)
• Fixed cost = 30 lacs.
• CM ratio = 30%.
• BE sales = 30 ÷ 0.30 = 100 lacs.
• As capacity % of Plant A’s own full capacity:
o BE utilization = 100 ÷ 214.2857 = 0.4666667 = 46.67%.
Interpretation: Plant A needs to run at about 46.67% capacity to break even — comfortably
below its current 70% run rate, so Plant A is profitable as it stands.
Plant B (before merger)
• Fixed cost = 20 lacs.
• CM ratio = 16.6667% (1/6).
• BE sales = 20 ÷ (1/6) = 20 × 6 = 120 lacs.
• As capacity % of Plant B’s full capacity:
Easy2Siksha.com
o BE utilization = 120 ÷ 150 = 0.80 = 80%.
Interpretation: Plant B needs to run at 80% capacity to break even, but it’s currently at only
60% — so B is running at a loss right now.
Merged plant (after merger, with extra Rs.2 lacs fixed)
• Combined fixed = 30 + 20 + 2 = 52 lacs.
• Combined CM ratio = 25% (calculated earlier).
• BE sales = 52 ÷ 0.25 = 208 lacs.
• As capacity % of merged full capacity:
o BE utilization = 208 ÷ 364.2857 = 0.5714286 = 57.14%.
Interpretation: The merged plant needs to operate at about 57.14% of combined capacity
to break even.
Quick sanity check (what profit are they making now?)
At the current combined sales of 240 lacs:
• Combined contribution = 60 lacs.
• Fixed = 52 lacs.
• Profit = Contribution − Fixed = 60 − 52 = 8 lacs.
So the merger (even with the extra Rs.2 lacs fixed cost) would be profitable at the current
aggregated sales — since 240 lacs > breakeven sales 208 lacs — resulting in Rs. 8 lacs profit.
(b) What capacity utilization of the integrated plant is required to earn Rs. 18 lacs profit?
To earn a target profit, required sales = (Fixed + Target Profit) ÷ CM ratio.
• Fixed after merger = 52 lacs.
• Target profit = 18 lacs.
• CM ratio = 25%.
Required sales = (52 + 18) ÷ 0.25 = 70 ÷ 0.25 = 280 lacs.
Now convert required sales to capacity utilization of merged plant:
• Full capacity = 364.2857 lacs.
• Utilization = 280 ÷ 364.2857 = 0.76923077 = 76.92% (≈ 77%).
Answer: The merged plant must operate at about 76.92% capacity (roughly 77%) to earn Rs.
18 lacs profit.
Easy2Siksha.com
Final tidy answers (so the examiner can spot them quickly)
(a)
• Plant A breakeven: Rs. 100 lacs → 46.67% of Plant A’s capacity.
• Plant B breakeven: Rs. 120 lacs → 80% of Plant B’s capacity.
• Merged plant breakeven: Rs. 208 lacs → 57.14% of combined capacity.
(b)
• For Rs. 18 lacs profit, merged plant must achieve Rs. 280 lacs sales → 76.92% (≈77%)
of combined capacity.
A little closing moral (so the story sticks)
Plant A was already doing fine — its contribution margin gave it a low breakeven. Plant B
was the vulnerable sibling, needing a high utilization to survive. When they merge, the
stronger contribution margin of A lifts the combined CM ratio to 25%, and the combined
fixed costs (even after adding Rs. 2 lacs integration cost) produce a new breakeven that is
between the two old ones. The merger reduces the combined breakeven utilization
compared to B’s lonely 80%, but to reach a comfortable profit target (Rs. 18 lacs), the new
entity must run at a healthy ~77% of its combined capacity.
6. What are the different types of Standard Cost? What are the advantages and limitations
of Standard Costing?
Ans: 󷊆󷊇 A Fresh Beginning – Imagine a Factory as a Kitchen
Think of a big restaurant kitchen instead of a dull factory. The chef (the manager) runs the
kitchen, the cooks (workers) do the cooking, the raw ingredients are the materials, and the
final dishes are the products.
Now, in this kitchen, the chef doesn’t like surprises. He doesn’t want tomatoes suddenly
costing double, cooks taking 2 hours instead of 1, or gas bills shooting up unexpectedly. To
stay in control, the chef makes standards. He writes down:
• How much tomatoes should be used for one plate of pasta.
• How much time a cook should take to prepare it.
• How much gas and spices should cost for the dish.
Easy2Siksha.com
These “should-be” figures are what we call Standard Costs. They act like a recipe card for
the business — guiding costs, controlling waste, and showing whether performance is good
or bad.
Now, let’s step deeper into the kitchen and understand the different types of standard
costs first.
󷐹󷐺󷐾󷐿󷐻󷑀󷐼󷑁󷑂󷑃󷑄󷐽 Types of Standard Costs
Just like recipes differ for simple home food, festival feasts, or fine dining, standard costs
also have different flavors.
1. Ideal Standard Cost
o This is like the dream recipe — no wastage, no delays, no mistakes.
o Example: The chef believes that a cook should take exactly 30 minutes to
prepare pasta, use exactly 100g of tomatoes, and waste zero.
o Reality? Almost impossible! Cooks get tired, tomatoes spoil, mistakes
happen.
o So, this type of standard is too “idealistic.” It motivates, but can also frustrate
workers.
2. Attainable Standard Cost (Practical Standard)
o This is a more realistic recipe. It assumes small wastage, minor delays, or
some unavoidable issues.
o Example: The chef says, “Okay, I know tomatoes can spoil by 2% and a cook
may need 35 minutes instead of 30. That’s normal.”
o These standards are challenging but achievable. This is the most widely used
standard in businesses because it balances ambition with reality.
3. Basic Standard Cost
o Think of this like an old family recipe written years ago and never changed.
o Example: “We always used 50g of cheese per pizza since 2000, so we’ll keep
using that figure to compare costs year after year.”
o The problem? Ingredients, prices, and techniques change over time. But basic
standards help in comparing performance over long periods (like seeing cost
trends).
4. Current Standard Cost
o This is the “today’s recipe.” It is updated regularly to match current prices
and conditions.
o Example: The chef updates the recipe every month because tomato prices
rise or fall, or because new equipment makes cooking faster.
o It’s very useful for present planning but not great for long-term comparison
because it keeps changing.
󷘹󷘴󷘵󷘶󷘷󷘸 Why Do Businesses Use Standard Costing? (Advantages)
Easy2Siksha.com
Now imagine our chef running the restaurant without any recipe cards, without knowing
how much time, effort, and ingredients a dish should take. Chaos, right? That’s what
happens to businesses without standard costing.
Here are the advantages told through our kitchen story:
1. Helps in Planning and Budgeting
o Just like a chef knows how much tomatoes and cheese he needs in advance,
managers can forecast costs, prepare budgets, and avoid surprises.
2. Cost Control through Variance Analysis
o Suppose the recipe says pasta should cost ₹50, but yesterday it cost ₹65. The
chef immediately checks:
▪ Did the cook use extra cheese?
▪ Did tomatoes become costlier?
o This difference between standard and actual cost is called variance, and it
helps control waste.
3. Motivation for Workers
o Workers know the target — like a cook aiming to prepare pasta in 35
minutes. Achievable targets encourage efficiency and teamwork.
4. Decision Making Becomes Easier
o Suppose a new supplier offers cheaper cheese. The chef compares the
standard cost with the new offer and decides whether to switch.
o Similarly, businesses make decisions about pricing, outsourcing, or
investment using standard costing.
5. Performance Measurement
o A restaurant can easily see which cook is fast and economical, and which one
is wasting resources.
o In companies, managers identify efficient departments and those needing
improvement.
6. Saves Time and Effort in Routine Work
o Once standards are set, day-to-day costing becomes easier. No need to
calculate from scratch every time.
󽀼󽀽󽁀󽁁󽀾󽁂󽀿󽁃 But Wait… Standard Costing is Not Perfect (Limitations)
Just like even the best recipe can’t guarantee a perfect dish every time, standard costing
also has its weaknesses.
1. Difficulty in Setting Standards
o Imagine setting a “perfect recipe” for every dish when ingredient quality,
chef skills, and customer preferences keep changing.
o Similarly, fixing a fair and realistic standard cost requires a lot of research,
time, and expertise.
2. Becomes Outdated Quickly
Easy2Siksha.com
o Tomato prices today may double tomorrow. If standards aren’t updated,
comparisons become meaningless.
o Businesses must revise standards regularly, which can be costly.
3. Can Demotivate Workers
o If standards are too high (ideal standard), workers feel pressurized and
discouraged.
o Example: A cook expected to make pasta in 20 minutes when it actually takes
35 may feel hopeless.
4. Not Suitable for All Industries
o Standard costing works best in industries with repetitive production (like
food, textiles, or cement).
o But in creative or customized industries (like fashion designing or film
making), it’s hard to fix “standard costs.”
5. Ignores Qualitative Factors
o Standard costing looks only at costs, not quality or customer satisfaction.
o Example: A cook may save costs by reducing cheese but compromise taste.
Similarly, in factories, focusing only on cost control may harm quality.
󷈷󷈸󷈹󷈺󷈻󷈼 Wrapping Up the Story
So, let’s go back to our kitchen. The chef’s recipe cards (standard costs) are not just about
cooking but about planning, controlling, motivating, and deciding. They help the restaurant
run smoothly, but the chef must also remember — recipes need updating, cooks are human,
and not every day will be perfect.
In the same way, Standard Costing in business is a powerful tool, but it is not magic. It gives
direction, control, and efficiency, but only works well when standards are fair, regularly
updated, and applied in the right industries.
SECTION-D
7. The following data pertains to a company's first week of operations in June, 2011:
Material:
Actual purchased = 1,500 units @ Rs. 3.80 per unit
Actual usage =1,350 units
Standard usage = 1,020 units @ Rs. 4.00 per unit
Direct Labour:
Easy2Siksha.com
Actual hours =310 hours @ Rs. 12.10 per hour
Standard hours = 340 hours @ Rs. 12.00 per hour
Required: Compare the following variances to determine whether they are favourable or
unfavourable:
(a) Material purchase price variance and quantity variance.
(b) Labour rate efficiency variance.
Ans: A little factory story — with numbers that talk
Imagine a small factory named JuneSprout Ltd. — it just opened its doors in the first week
of June, 2011. The manager, Meera, sits down after the week’s work with her notebook. She
wants to know two things: (1) how well the factory bought and used material, and (2) how
well the labour team performed. To find out, she compares what actually happened with
what the factory had set as the standard (the target). We’ll walk through the story of what
happened, why the numbers look the way they do, and what they mean — step by step and
in plain, exam-friendly terms.
The facts (the cast)
Material
• Actual purchased = 1,500 units at Rs. 3.80 per unit → Actual cost = 1,500 × 3.80 = Rs.
5,700.
• Actual usage (what was actually consumed in production) = 1,350 units.
• Standard usage (what should have been used for the output achieved) = 1,020 units
at Rs. 4.00 per unit.
Direct Labour
• Actual hours worked = 310 hours at Rs. 12.10 per hour → Actual labour cost = 310 ×
12.10 = Rs. 3,751.
• Standard hours allowed = 340 hours at Rs. 12.00 per hour → Standard labour cost =
340 × 12.00 = Rs. 4,080.
Meera now computes the standard variances: material purchase price variance, material
quantity (usage) variance, labour rate variance and labour efficiency variance. Let’s decode
each in story form.
(a) Material — two faces of the same coin
Easy2Siksha.com
Think of material variances as two detectives examining how buying and using materials
affected the pocketbook.
1. Material Purchase Price Variance (the buying detective)
This asks: Did we pay more or less per unit than planned?
Formula (intuitive version):
Price variance = (Standard price − Actual price) × Actual quantity purchased
Plug in numbers:
Standard price = Rs. 4.00, Actual price = Rs. 3.80, Actual quantity purchased = 1,500.
So: (4.00 − 3.80) × 1,500 = 0.20 × 1,500 = Rs. 300 favourable.
Story meaning: The purchasing team bought material cheaper than the standard price —
they saved Rs. 300. That’s good news (favourable), but Meera also wonders: did they save
because of a genuine better deal, or because the material quality was lower? A favourable
price variance is welcome — unless it hides a quality problem that causes downstream
waste.
2. Material Quantity (Usage) Variance (the usage detective)
This asks: Did we use more or less material in production than the standard allowed for the
output we made?
Formula:
Quantity variance = (Actual quantity used − Standard quantity allowed) × Standard price
(If Actual > Standard → adverse; if Actual < Standard → favourable.)
Numbers: Actual used = 1,350 units; Standard allowed = 1,020 units; Standard price = Rs.
4.00.
So: (1,350 − 1,020) × 4.00 = 330 × 4.00 = Rs. 1,320 adverse (unfavourable).
Story meaning: Even though the buying team saved Rs. 300 at purchase, the production
floor used 330 units more than the standard allowed. That extra usage cost the company Rs.
1,320 more than expected. Common causes: waste, scrap, poor handling, inferior quality of
cheaper material, machine settings wrong, or measurement mistakes. So the small saving
on price was eaten up — and exceeded — by extra usage.
Net material effect
• Price saving: Rs. 300 favourable
• Usage loss: Rs. 1,320 unfavourable
Net = 300 favourable − 1,320 unfavourable = Rs. 1,020 unfavourable (adverse) overall on
materials.
Easy2Siksha.com
Plain takeaway: Buying cheaper felt nice, but using a lot more material than standard
produced a bigger loss. The factory must check whether low price caused low quality, or
whether process problems caused the extra usage.
(b) Direct Labour — two angles again
Labour variances show whether the company paid more or less per hour than planned, and
whether workers took more or fewer hours than the standard for the output achieved.
1. Labour Rate Variance (are we paying the right wage?)
Formula:
Rate variance = (Actual rate − Standard rate) × Actual hours
(Positive = adverse if actual rate higher; or use Standard − Actual to show favourable
positive.)
Numbers: Actual rate = Rs. 12.10, Standard = Rs. 12.00, Actual hours = 310.
So: (12.10 − 12.00) × 310 = 0.10 × 310 = Rs. 31 adverse (unfavourable).
Story meaning: The payroll paid slightly more per hour than the standard — Rs. 0.10 extra
per hour for 310 hours cost Rs. 31. Possible causes: pay raises, overtime premiums, use of
more skilled (and costlier) staff, or a small payroll error.
2. Labour Efficiency (or Efficiency) Variance (were we faster or slower?)
Formula:
Efficiency variance = (Actual hours − Standard hours) × Standard rate
(If Actual < Standard → favourable; if Actual > Standard → adverse.)
Numbers: Actual hours = 310; Standard hours = 340; Standard rate = Rs. 12.00.
So: (310 − 340) × 12 = (−30) × 12 = Rs. 360 favourable.
Story meaning: The workforce finished the job faster than the standard — they used 30
fewer hours than allowed — saving Rs. 360. That’s a strong positive sign: better
productivity, fewer delays, or possibly less complex work done than planned.
Net labour effect
• Rate variance: Rs. 31 adverse
• Efficiency: Rs. 360 favourable
Net labour = 360 favourable − 31 adverse = Rs. 329 favourable overall on labour.
Easy2Siksha.com
Plain takeaway: Even though Meera paid a tiny bit more per hour, the team was much
more efficient and saved more time than expected. Labour performance overall helped the
week’s results.
Final exam-ready summary (clean and crisp)
Material
• Purchase price variance = Rs. 300 Favourable (bought at Rs. 3.80 vs standard Rs.
4.00).
• Quantity (usage) variance = Rs. 1,320 Unfavourable (used 1,350 vs standard 1,020).
• Net material variance = Rs. 1,020 Unfavourable.
Labour
• Rate variance = Rs. 31 Unfavourable (paid Rs. 12.10 vs Rs. 12.00).
• Efficiency variance = Rs. 360 Favourable (310 hours used vs 340 standard).
• Net labour variance = Rs. 329 Favourable.
Friendly suggestions Meera should act on (short and practical)
1. Investigate material over-usage: Why 330 extra units were used? Look for scrap,
rework, machine adjustments, or poor material quality.
2. Review purchase quality vs. price: The cheaper purchase saved Rs. 300 but may
have caused the higher usage — check supplier quality.
3. Celebrate labour efficiency but confirm quality: Faster work is great — but ensure
product quality wasn’t sacrificed to save hours.
4. Record-keeping: Ensure actual quantities/hours are measured correctly to avoid
misleading variances.
Closing line — what the numbers tell us in plain English
Meera’s week reads like a small drama: the purchasing team won a small skirmish by buying
cheaper material, but the production floor lost the battle by using much more than it should
have. On the bright side, the labour team fought well — they were quicker than expected,
which more than made up for the slightly higher wage paid. Overall, the factory has clear
signals: fix material usage (or material quality), and keep doing what’s working on labour
efficiency. The variances don’t just give numbers — they tell a story you can act on.
Easy2Siksha.com
8.Distinguish between budget, budgeting and budgetary control. What are the advantages
and limitations of budgetary control?
Ans: A Different Beginning
Imagine you are the captain of a cricket team. You have an important tournament coming
up, and your aim is to win the cup. Now, if you want to succeed, you can’t just go and play
randomly. You’ll need a plan—how much practice your team should do, how many bowlers
and batsmen should play, how you’ll manage resources like nets, travel, food, and even the
funds required.
This whole planning, managing, and keeping a watch on whether things are going according
to the plan or not—this is exactly what Budget, Budgeting, and Budgetary Control are all
about. Businesses, like cricket teams, cannot succeed without clear plans and controls.
Now let’s step into the world of these three words—Budget, Budgeting, and Budgetary
Control—and see how they are different yet connected, and later, we’ll explore their
advantages and limitations.
1. What is a Budget?
Think of a budget as a map or blueprint.
• In cricket, your budget is like a match plan: “We need 300 runs in 50 overs, with 2
openers, 1 all-rounder, and specific field placements.”
• In business, a budget is a financial or quantitative statement prepared in advance
that shows how much income is expected and how expenses will be managed in a
specific period.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Definition (in simple words):
A budget is a pre-prepared statement that shows what you want to achieve and how much
money, manpower, or materials will be used.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Example:
If you are a college student, and your father gives you ₹5,000 pocket money for a month,
you make a budget:
• ₹1,500 for food in the canteen
• ₹1,000 for books and notes
• ₹500 for phone recharge
• ₹2,000 savings
This is your “budget.”
Easy2Siksha.com
2. What is Budgeting?
If the budget is a map, then budgeting is the process of drawing that map.
• In cricket, budgeting is when the captain and coach sit with players and decide: who
will bat first, how many overs a bowler should bowl, and how practice sessions will
be divided.
• In business, budgeting means preparing different budgets for different departments
like sales budget, production budget, cash budget, etc.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Definition (in simple words):
Budgeting is the process of making budgets and linking them together to form a master plan
for the organization.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Example:
If you decide every month where your ₹5,000 will go, and you adjust it when exams come
(maybe spend more on notes, less on outings), you are doing budgeting.
So, budget = one-time prepared plan.
Budgeting = continuous activity of preparing budgets again and again.
3. What is Budgetary Control?
Now comes the real game changer. A budget is useless if you don’t control and compare.
That’s where budgetary control enters.
• In cricket, budgetary control is when the coach actually checks if players are
following the plan. If the bowler was supposed to bowl 10 overs but is tired after 5,
the coach adjusts the strategy.
• In business, budgetary control means using budgets as a tool to compare actual
performance with planned performance, finding out differences, and taking
corrective action.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Definition (in simple words):
Budgetary control is a system where budgets are prepared, actual performance is recorded,
and the two are compared to ensure that the organization stays on track.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Example:
If you planned to spend ₹500 for recharge but actually spent ₹800 because of Netflix binge-
watching, your parents may scold you and cut costs elsewhere. This checking, comparing,
and correcting is budgetary control.
Distinction Between Budget, Budgeting, and Budgetary Control
Easy2Siksha.com
Let’s make the difference crystal clear:
Basis
Budget
Budgetary Control
Meaning
A financial or quantitative
plan prepared beforehand
The system of controlling
business operations
through budgets
Nature
A statement/document
A technique/system
Scope
Narrow (just one plan)
Widest (uses budgets +
actual performance +
corrective actions)
Time
Prepared once for a period
Continuous (control
applied throughout)
Purpose
To plan expected results
To ensure objectives are
achieved
So, you can say:
• Budget = Plan
• Budgeting = Planning process
• Budgetary Control = Supervision & correction
4. Advantages of Budgetary Control
Just like a cricket team benefits from proper planning and checking, a business also enjoys
many benefits of budgetary control:
1. Clear Objectives – Every department knows its role and target (like batsmen
knowing their strike rate).
2. Efficient Resource Use – Money, material, and manpower are used wisely without
wastage.
3. Coordination – Sales, production, finance—all work in harmony.
4. Performance Measurement – Managers can easily compare results and know who is
performing well.
5. Cost Control – Helps in reducing unnecessary expenses.
6. Future Preparation – Businesses can prepare for risks and uncertainties better.
7. Motivation – Employees feel motivated when targets are set and achieved.
8. Decision Making – Provides reliable data for managers to make correct decisions.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Example:
If a company prepares a sales budget of 10,000 units and production makes exactly that
much, there is no overproduction or shortage—this saves money and satisfies customers.
Easy2Siksha.com
5. Limitations of Budgetary Control
Of course, no system is perfect. Budgetary control also has some limitations, like:
1. Based on Estimates – Budgets are forecasts; if estimates are wrong, the plan fails.
2. Rigidity – Sometimes, managers stick to budgets blindly, even when situations
demand flexibility.
3. Time-Consuming & Costly – Preparing and checking budgets requires time, effort,
and money.
4. Discouragement – If targets are unrealistic, employees may feel demotivated.
5. Conflict Between Departments – Each department may try to achieve its own
budget, ignoring the overall company goals.
6. Short-Term Focus – Budgetary control sometimes emphasizes short-term goals,
ignoring long-term growth.
󹵙󹵚󹵛󹵜 Example:
If a cricket team plans for a slow pitch but the actual pitch turns out fast, their budget (plan)
becomes useless, and sticking to it may cause defeat.
Wrapping Up the Story
So, coming back to our cricket example:
• Budget is the match plan (how many runs, who bats first).
• Budgeting is the process of preparing the plan (meetings, discussions, strategies).
• Budgetary Control is checking during the match whether the plan is working, and
making changes when needed.
In business too, these three steps are essential: you first prepare a budget, then engage in
budgeting, and finally apply budgetary control to ensure everything stays on track.
Without this system, a business would run like a cricket team without a coach—chaotic,
directionless, and full of wasted opportunities.
“This paper has been carefully prepared for educational purposes. If you notice any mistakes or
have suggestions, feel free to share your feedback.”